YouTube FruitFly's link toQueers have low-level reproduction statistics

Oh wait!  That was the “Family Values Crowd” that was talking about that… I forgot!!

Hooray for the liberals in Massachusetts!!  They’ve elected their first porn-star!!

If we’re going to celebrate the New Year – we may as well celebrate it like hetero-white homophobes!

PAT ROBERTSON: And, you know, Kristi, something happened a long time ago in Haiti, and people might not want to talk about it. They were under the heel of the French. You know, Napoleon III and whatever. And they got together and swore a pact to the devil. They said, “We will serve you if you will get us free from the French.” True story. And so, the devil said, “OK, it’s a deal.”

And they kicked the French out. You know, the Haitians revolted and got themselves free. But ever since, they have been cursed by one thing after the other. Desperately poor. That island of Hispaniola is one island. It’s cut down the middle. On the one side is Haiti; on the other side is the Dominican Republic. Dominican Republic is prosperous, healthy, full of resorts, et cetera. Haiti is in desperate poverty. Same island. They need to have and we need to pray for them a great turning to God. And out of this tragedy, I’m optimistic something good may come. But right now, we’re helping the suffering people, and the suffering is unimaginable.

KRISTI WATTS (co-douche bag): Absolutely, Pat.

Absolutely, Pat.

Haitian people deserved this?

Seriously?

h

Youch! And you thought live in GOPville was all about Smufs and unicorns.

Now that Richard Lugar (R-IN) has ditched the GOP and the Tea-Baggers by complaining about Cheney’s constant bitching about Barack Obama, all of the cards on the table are in play.

Jan. 8 (Bloomberg) — Richard Lugar, the top Republican on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, defended President Barack Obama’s handling of recent terrorism threats, taking issue with former Vice President Dick Cheney’s criticism.
“It’s unfair,” Lugar said in an interview for Bloomberg Television’s “Political Capital with Al Hunt,” airing this weekend. “I think the president is focused.”

Cheney, who frequently has led Republican attacks on the Democratic president since leaving office a year ago, told Politico on Dec. 29 that Obama “is trying to pretend we are not at war” with a “low-key response” to the Dec. 25 attempt to ignite a bomb aboard a flight to Detroit.

As if you cared what the GOP has to say anyway.  Nobody is listening to what the GOP has to say anyway.  They’re too busy stapling tea-bags to their foreheads and pretending that they’re relevant!

Jealous that the Nobel Committee has passed on handing the Prize to their own personal douchebags like Bush, Cheney or Libertarian Old-Crank Ron Paul (R-TX), the Right Wing Nuts have come up with a brand-new reason to complain about President Obama.

From the American Heritage Foundation’s Matthew Spaulding quotes the United States Constitution has his source of the gripe:

A clause in Article I, Section 9 of the U.S. Constitution states: “No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office or Trust under them, shall, without the consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign state.” That raises a question: Is the Nobel Peace Prize an “Emolument” — a gift arising from one’s office which includes some sort of monetary award with it?

Spaulding points out that Obama has 60 days to hand over the award (so they can deny he was ever awarded it in the first place).  I’ll assume that if Obama doesn’t hand over the award, Spaulding and his band of Merry Goofs will hire the Sheriff of Nottingham to have the President of the United States arrested and tried for treason.

Spaulding opens his mouth and dumb things come tumbling out of it:

“The Commission, the group that gives out the Nobel Prize, is actually appointed by the Parliament of Norway, which is [to] say that it’s connected with a foreign state. This makes it very interesting,” the Heritage scholar notes.  “In 1993, President Clinton’s own Office of Legal Counsel said that it didn’t have to be a foreign state acting in a formal way, but could be, rather, indirect. [This] seems to be a perfect example of what the Nobel Prize is — and the Founders put this clause in the Constitution precisely to make sure that foreign states didn’t unwarrantedly influence American domestic politics.”

Enter his conspiracy theory:

Spalding believes the Nobel Prize Commission intended to give the award to a president who had not yet accomplished anything, in hopes of encouraging him to do certain things in the future. Interestingly Nobel committee chairman Thorbjorn Jagland has defended the choice of Obama, saying the prize should be an “instrument for peace rather than [a] stamp of approval.”

Barack Obama is the third sitting president to be given the award after Woodrow Wilson (D) and Theodore Roosevelt (R & Progressive Party).  I’ll go out on a limb here, but I’m guessing Spaulding didn’t have a problem with those earlier two presidents’ award because they were white guys. It’s the black guys, you see, that can’t be trusted.

Give a black man a Nobel Prize, and he’ll kiss anybody’s booty-ass.  Everybody knows that!  Just ask Matthew Spaulding!

I’m going out on a limb and take a guess that this stupidity will be the new Fox News “Haunt” throughout the Holiday Season.  They’re going to milk this stupidity throughout New Years Eve.

h/t Joe.My.God.